Accessibility statement for Scottish Gaelic Subtitling website

This website accessibility statement is in line with the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018.

This accessibility statement applies to: the Scottish Gaelic Subtitling website.

This website is run by the School of Literatures, Languages and Cultures at the University of Edinburgh. It has been developed on the platform Hugging Face. We want as many people as possible to be able to use this website. For example, that means you should be able to:

• change most colours, contrast levels and fonts
• experience no requirement to use dragging movements
• use the website without encountering any cognitive function tests

We've also made the website text as simple as possible to understand. However, some of our content is technical, and we use technical terms where there is no easier wording we could use without changing what the text means.

Customising the website

AbilityNet has advice on making your device easier to use if you have a disability. This is an external site with suggestions to make your computer more accessible.

With a few simple steps you can customise the appearance of our website using your browser settings to make it easier to read and navigate: additional information on how to customise our website appearance.

If you are a member of University staff or a student, you can use the free SensusAccess accessible document conversion service: information on SensusAccess.

How accessible this website is

We know some parts of this website are not fully accessible:

• some colour contrasts don't meet the required contrast levels
• not all non-text content has a text alternative
• the site is not fully accessible with assistive software
• not all link text is meaningful
• buttons don't have discernible text
• error messages and instructions could be much clearer and meaningful
• reflow is not enabled to 400%
• there is information conveyed by colour only
• not all content can be reached by keyboard
• keyboard navigation does not always follow a logical order
• there is no skip to main content option
• where you have tabbed to doesn't have a clear indication
• heading levels are skipped
• tooltips can't be reached by keyboard or assistive software
• not all video content has human corrected captions, human corrected transcripts and audio description
• users are not alerted when new browser tabs or pop ups will open
• there is a moving animation that cannot be stopped or paused by the end user

Feedback and contact information

If you need information on this website in a different format, including accessible PDF, large print, audio recording or braille:

• email: eist@ed.ac.uk
• postal: ÈIST project, c/o Prof Will Lamb, 50 George Sq, Edinburgh, EH8 9LH

We'll consider your request and get back to you in 5 working days.

Reporting accessibility problems with this website

We are always looking to improve the accessibility of this website. If you find any problems not listed on this page, or think we're not meeting accessibility requirements, please contact:

• email: eist@ed.ac.uk
• postal: ÈIST project, c/o Prof Will Lamb, 50 George Sq, Edinburgh, EH8 9LH

We'll consider your request and get back to you in 5 working days.

Enforcement procedure

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is responsible for enforcing the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018 (the 'accessibility regulations'). If you're not happy with how we respond to your complaint, please contact the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS) directly.

The government has produced information on reporting an accessibility problem on a public sector website.

Technical information about this website's accessibility

The University of Edinburgh is committed to making its websites and applications accessible, in accordance with the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018.

Compliance status

This website is partially compliant with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 AA standard, due to the non-compliances listed below.

The full guidelines are available at: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 AA standard.

Non accessible content

The content listed below is non-accessible for the following reasons.

Non-compliance with the accessibility regulations

The following items do not comply with the WCAG 2.2 AA success criteria:

• not all non-text content has appropriate alternative text
  1.1.1 Non-text content
• not all videos have human-corrected transcripts
  1.2.1 Audio-only and video-only (prerecorded)
• not all videos have human-corrected captions
  1.2.2 Captions (prerecorded)
• videos don't have audio descriptions
  1.2.5 Audio description (prerecorded)
• required fields are not labelled as such, either visually or with an audio alert for screen reader users
  1.3.1 Info and relationships
  3.3.2 Labels or instructions
• keyboard navigation does not always follow a logical order
  1.3.2 Meaningful sequence
  2.4.3 Focus order
• some information is conveyed by colour only
  1.4.1 Use of colour
• there were colour contrast issues identified
  1.4.3 Contrast (minimum)
• reflow is not operating correctly up to 400%
  1.4.10 Reflow
• tooltips are inaccessible by keyboard and assistive software
  1.4.13 Content on hover or focus
• not all content can be reached by keyboard alone
  2.1.1 Keyboard
• there is moving content that cannot be stopped or paused by the user
  2.2.2 Pause, stop, hide
• there is no skip to main content option
  2.4.1 Bypass blocks
• not all links have meaningful hypertext
  2.4.4 Link purpose (in context)
• some heading levels are skipped and headings are not used appropriately
  2.4.6 Headings and labels
• it's not always easy to identify where you've tabbed to
  2.4.7 Focus visible
• the <html> element does not have a lang attribute
  3.1.1 Language of page
• links open as pop ups or new tabs without warning the user
  3.2.2 On input
• error messages are lacking content and are not meaningful
  3.3.1 Error identification
  3.3.2 Labels or instructions
  3.3.3 Error suggestion
• the site is not fully compatible with screen readers and speech-to-text technology, for example buttons do not have discernible text
  4.1.2 Name, role, value

We aim to improve our website's accessibility on a regular and continuous basis. See the section below ('What we're doing to improve accessibility') on how we are improving our site's accessibility.

We are working towards solving these problems and expect several improvements for any issues within our control by July 2027. The site is fully within our control.

Disproportionate burden

We are not currently claiming that any accessibility problems would be a disproportionate burden to fix.

Content that's not within the scope of the accessibility regulations

At this time we believe no content is outwith the scope of the accessibility regulations.

What we're doing to improve accessibility

We are working towards solving these problems and expect several improvements for any issues within our control by July 2027. The site is fully within our control.

While we are in the process of resolving these accessibility issues, we will ensure reasonable adjustments are in place to make sure no user is disadvantaged. As changes are made, we will continue to review accessibility and retest the accessibility of this website.

Preparation of this accessibility statement

This statement was prepared on 30 July 2026. It was last reviewed on 7 August 2026.

The website was last tested in July 2026. The testing was carried out by the Disability Information Service at the University of Edinburgh, using both automated and manual methods. The site was tested on a PC, primarily using Google Chrome, alongside Microsoft Edge and Mozilla Firefox.

A recent world-wide usage survey for different screen readers and browsers shows that Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Microsoft Edge are increasing in popularity, and that Google Chrome is now the favoured browser for screen readers: WebAIM: Screen Reader User Survey.

The three browsers mentioned above have been used for reasons of breadth and variety.

We ran automated testing using AXE (Google Chrome extension), and then manual testing that included:

• spell check functionality
• scaling using different resolutions and reflow
• options to customise the interface (magnification, font, background colour, etc)
• keyboard navigation and keyboard traps
• data validation
• warning of links opening in a new tab or window
• information conveyed in colour or sound only
• flashing, moving or scrolling text
• use with screen reading software (for example JAWS)
• assistive software (TextHelp Read and Write, Windows Magnifier, ZoomText, Dragon Naturally Speaking, TalkBack and VoiceOver)
• tooltips and text alternatives for any non-text content
• time limits
• compatibility with mobile accessibility functionality (Android and iOS)
• any drag functionality and alternatives
• consistent help function
• no need to re-enter data already submitted
• any cognitive tests

Change log

This section will receive updates when accessibility improvements are made to the website.